Colfax Corporation Blog
17Jun/100

Comments from the Electric Storage Conference

I attended the 2010 Electric Storage Conference in Charlotte earlier this month.  This was the 20th Anniversary of the event and was hosted by Duke Energy.  Electric Storage covers a broad range of storage technologies including flywheel, compressed-air energy storage, battery (self-contained and from electric vehicles), and pumped hydro.  The interest in storage technologies has grown as Smart Grid investment, renewable energy and decentralized power systems have increased in popularity and feasibility.

Other than Internet research, this was my first experience with electric storage and, as you would expect, there was a lot to take in.  I came away with 4 key points.

#1 – There are multiple technologies that operate in this space and each seems to fill a specific market segment.  The market is divided into three segments – Power Quality, Bridging Power, and Energy Management.  The Electric Storage Association provides a good overview of the various technologies through their web-site.  The Electric Power Research Institute estimates the total market capacity by 2030 can reach 29 GW (23 GW at $700/kw, 6 GW at $1,400/kw).

#2 – The value of the electric storage is broad and depends on many factors.  It is impossible to talk about the value of each technology in a single blog post, but energy storage can positively affect generation, transmission and distribution (T&D), Smart Grid and the end Customer.  Since Colfax primarily focuses on utility scale generation, I’ll list some of the discussed areas where Storage could be valuable: peak generation replacement, intermediate generation deferral, ancillary service generation replacement and intermittent generation smoothing. You’ll note that implementation of storage technologies would likely lead to capital deferment or elimination.  In a future post, I‘ll discuss comments from the Electric Power Show where keynote panelists talked about $700B+ in capital that utilities will need to spend in the next 20 years.

You may also want to check the EPRI’s web-site as they plan to publish a white paper primer on applications, costs and benefits of electric storage.

#3 – Without recognition within our national energy policy, the opportunities will be spotty.  Of course, a national energy policy is also mixed with regional/local decisions, but the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is responsible for the US energy policy and has strategic influence over regional commissions.  Senator Ron Wyden is an advocate for Energy Storage and has openly challenged FERC’s exclusion of energy storage from their recent strategic plan.  He spoke briefly to the audience about his work to influence FERC.

#4 - Electric storage technologies are here to stay.  It was interesting to hear the conference organizers talk about the initial Electric Storage conferences when only 20 – 50 people attended.  (This year, I estimate that well over 2,000 people attended the event.)  As mentioned previously, there will be many different technologies that fill this space.  However, Duke Energy has classified Energy Storage as a strategic technology stating that “low-cost storage, when combined with economic renewable generation and Smart Grid capabilities can change our business model” with “low cost” in the $500/kw area.

If you are working in this space, you may want to look for funding available from the Recovery act.  Here is a listing per state –

Alabama recovery.alabama.gov Nebraska recovery.nebraska.gov
Alaska alaska.gov/recovery Nevada nv.gov/default.aspx
Arizona az.gov/recovery New Hampshire nh.gov/recovery
California recovery.ca.gov New Jersey state.nj.us/recovery/index.shtml
Colorado colorado.gov/recovery New Mexico recovery.state.nm.us
Connecticut ct.gov/recovery New York recovery.ny.gov
Delaware recovery.delaware.gov North Carolina ncrecovery.gov
Georgia ga.gov/recovery North Dakota nd.gov/recovery
Hawaii hawaii.gov/recovery Ohio jobstimulus.ohio.gov/
Idaho accountability.idaho.gov Oklahoma ok.gov/recovery
Illinois recovery.illinois.gov Oregon oregon.gov/recovery
Indiana in.gov/gov/INvest.htm Pennsylvania pa.gov/portal/server.pt/community/pa_gov/2966
Kansas governor.ks.gov/issues-a-initiatives/american-recovery-act Rhode Island recovery.ri.gov/programs/energy
Kentucky kentuckyatwork.ky.gov/Pages/default.aspx South Carolina stimulus.sc.gov
Louisiana stimulus.la.gov South Dakota recovery.sd.gov
Maine maine.gov/recovery Tennessee tnrecovery.gov
Maryland recovery.maryland.gov Texas window.state.tx.us/recovery/apply/grants.php
Massachusetts mass.gov/recovery Utah recovery.utah.gov
Michigan michigan.gov/recovery Vermont recovery.vermont.gov
Minnesota mmb.state.mn.us/recovery/ Virginia stimulus.virginia.gov
Mississippi stimulus.ms.gov Washington recovery.wa.gov
Missouri transform.mo.gov West Virginia recovery.wv.gov
Montana recovery.mt.gov Wisconsin recovery.wisconsin.gov
Wyoming wyoming.gov/recovery
<!--[if !mso]> <! st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } -->

I attended the 2010 Electric Storage Conference in Charlotte earlier this month. This was the 20th Anniversary of the event and was hosted by Duke Energy. Electric Storage covers a broad range of storage technologies including flywheel, compressed-air energy storage, battery (self-contained and from electric vehicles), and pumped hydro. The interest in storage technologies has grown as Smart Grid investment, renewable energy and decentralized power systems have increased in popularity and feasibility.

Other than Internet research, this was my first experience with electric storage and, as you would expect, there was a lot to take in. I came away with 4 key points.

#1 – There are multiple technologies that operate in this space and each seems to fill a specific market segment. The market is divided into three segments – Power Quality, Bridging Power, and Energy Management. The Electric Storage Association provides a good overview of the various technologies through their web-site. The Electric Power Research Institute estimates the total market capacity by 2030 can reach 29 GW (23 GW at $700/kw, 6 GW at $1,400/kw).

#2 – The value of the electric storage is broad and depends on many factors. It is impossible to talk about the value of each technology in a single blog post, but energy storage can positively affect generation, transmission and distribution (T&D), Smart Grid and the end Customer. Since Colfax primarily focuses on utility scale generation, I’ll list some of the discussed areas where Storage could be valuable: peak generation replacement, intermediate generation deferral, ancillary service generation replacement and intermittent generation smoothing. You’ll note that implementation of storage technologies would likely lead to capital deferment or elimination. In a future post, I‘ll discuss comments from the Electric Power Show where keynote panelists talked about $700B+ in capital that utilities will need to spend in the next 20 years.

You may also want to check the EPRI’s web-site as they plan to publish a white paper primer on applications, costs and benefits of electric storage.

#3 – Without recognition within our national energy policy, the opportunities will be spotty. Of course, a national energy policy is also mixed with regional/local decisions, but the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is responsible for the US energy policy and has strategic influence over regional commissions. Senator Ron Wyden is an advocate for Energy Storage and has openly challenged FERC’s exclusion of energy storage from their recent strategic plan. He spoke briefly to the audience about his work to influence FERC.

#4 - Electric storage technologies are here to stay. It was interesting to hear the conference organizers talk about the initial Electric Storage conferences when only 20 – 50 people attended. (This year, I estimate that well over 2,000 people attended the event.) As mentioned previously, there will be many different technologies that fill this space. However, Duke Energy has classified Energy Storage as a strategic technology stating that “low-cost storage, when combined with economic renewable generation and Smart Grid capabilities can change our business model” with “low cost” in the $500/kw area.

If you are working in this space, you may want to look for funding available from the Recovery act. Here is a listing per state –

Alabama

recovery.alabama.gov

Nebraska

recovery.nebraska.gov

Alaska

alaska.gov/recovery

Nevada

nv.gov/default.aspx

Arizona

az.gov/recovery

New Hampshire

nh.gov/recovery

California

recovery.ca.gov

New Jersey

state.nj.us/recovery/index.shtml

Colorado

colorado.gov/recovery

New Mexico

recovery.state.nm.us

Connecticut

ct.gov/recovery

New York

recovery.ny.gov

Delaware

recovery.delaware.gov

North Carolina

ncrecovery.gov

Georgia

ga.gov/recovery

North Dakota

nd.gov/recovery

Hawaii

hawaii.gov/recovery

Ohio

jobstimulus.ohio.gov/

Idaho

accountability.idaho.gov

Oklahoma

ok.gov/recovery

Illinois

recovery.illinois.gov

Oregon

oregon.gov/recovery

Indiana

in.gov/gov/INvest.htm

Pennsylvania

pa.gov/portal/server.pt/community/pa_gov/2966

Kansas

governor.ks.gov/issues-a-initiatives/american-recovery-act

Rhode Island

recovery.ri.gov/programs/energy

Kentucky

kentuckyatwork.ky.gov/Pages/default.aspx

South Carolina

stimulus.sc.gov

Louisiana

stimulus.la.gov

South Dakota

recovery.sd.gov

Maine

maine.gov/recovery

Tennessee

tnrecovery.gov

Maryland

recovery.maryland.gov

Texas

window.state.tx.us/recovery/apply/grants.php

Massachusetts

mass.gov/recovery

Utah

recovery.utah.gov

Michigan

michigan.gov/recovery

Vermont

recovery.vermont.gov

Minnesota

mmb.state.mn.us/recovery/

Virginia

stimulus.virginia.gov

Mississippi

stimulus.ms.gov

Washington

recovery.wa.gov

Missouri

transform.mo.gov

West Virginia

recovery.wv.gov

Montana

recovery.mt.gov

Wisconsin

recovery.wisconsin.gov

Wyoming

wyoming.gov/recovery